Stani, the visionary founder of the Lens Protocol, recently took to Twitter with a seemingly simple yet profound question: “Where should Lens Protocol be deployed next?” The decentralized world never disappoints when it comes to vocal and passionate advocates. Let’s dive into the results and get to know each of these L2s better, based on our comprehensive guide at Percs.
The Layer 2 Contenders:
1. ZK/ZKSync: 19 mentions
Summary: ZKSync is a ZK Rollups-based L2 scaling solution for Ethereum. It utilizes zero-knowledge proofs to achieve high scalability while ensuring data availability and maintaining the Ethereum security model. ZKSync promises low transaction fees and swift finality, making it a top pick among respondents.
2. AVAX/Avalanche: 14 mentions
Summary: Avalanche stands apart with its novel consensus mechanism that offers low latency and high throughput. It’s not just an L2 solution; it’s a fully-fledged platform supporting custom blockchain networks. It’s interoperable and comes with a promise of high performance.
3. Arbitrum: 9 mentions
Summary: Arbitrum is an optimistic rollup scaling solution that increases Ethereum’s capabilities by orders of magnitude. With a focus on developer experience and compatibility, it offers reduced gas costs and faster transaction throughput.
4. OP (Optimism): 5 mentions
Summary: Optimism offers optimistic rollups, a solution designed to scale smart contracts on Ethereum. It retains security while enhancing transaction speeds. Developers find it alluring because of its compatibility with Ethereum, allowing seamless transition of dApps.
5. Starknet: 5 mentions
Summary: StarkNet utilizes STARKs (Zero-Knowledge STARKs) to scale computation on Ethereum. It promises a universe where high throughput meets low fees, while ensuring decentralization and security. It aims to provide scalability without compromises.
6. Base: 4 mentions
Summary: Base is an emerging L2 that’s starting to gain traction. Its key proposition is the balance between scalability, security, and user experience, making it a viable option for future deployments.
7. Rollux: 4 mentions
Summary: Developed by SYS Labs and grounded in Bitcoin’s PoW security, Rollux offers a harmonized L2 solution combining Syscoin’s ecosystem features. It prioritizes unparalleled security, scalability, speed, and affordability, positioning itself as an innovative contender in the L2 space.
8. Algorand: 1 mention
Summary: Algorand isn’t strictly an L2, but a self-sustaining decentralized blockchain network. Known for its speed, finality, and open participation, its mention suggests that looking outside traditional L2s might be a strategy some consider.
9. Build Your Own Chain: 5 mentions
Summary: The spirit of decentralization sometimes calls for pioneering your path. Building a native chain for Lens Protocol might seem ambitious, but it offers unparalleled customization and independence. Five brave souls suggested this audacious move.
Conclusion:
The vast landscape of L2 solutions offers Lens Protocol numerous opportunities and pathways. Each comes with its strengths, weaknesses, and nuances. As we discussed in our piece on Lens Protocol and the Future of Decentralized Social Media, the right infrastructure is crucial for realizing its vision. Whatever Stani and the team decide, it will be a move watched by all in the decentralized space.
Which L2 would you choose? Join the debate and let’s together shape the future of decentralized platforms. Interested in learning more about what we are building? connect with us via email or through our social channels to explore how we can elevate your blockchain endeavors.
